Type Like The Wind

Kimberly Marlowe Hartnett's reviews, news, theories and quibbles.

RSS Feed

Archives for Health

Gimme five so I can blog faster

1 Comment

Human touch is a powerful language, says a study written about by Ben Carey of The New York Times. The story says a range of emotions can be shown, or triggered, by the most casual interactions, such as a slap on the back or a high-five.

Touch makes people feel better and even excel at things they do. I think back to that boss who often gave me an encouraging shoulder whack on deadline.  I probably worked harder in that job, or at least rose above the chaos with some success.  (I’m not talking about the creepy grabber-boss here, mind you.)

Read Carey’s story; he’s a fine reporter and always a strong writer. This time he slipped in a clever last paragraph, so pay attention.

Feb 24, 2010

Meat on our bones

3 Comments

A new study proves–are you paying attention?–that women with partners gain more weight than women without partners.

This finding comes out of a 10-year-long Australian study involving 6,000 women. I know scientists need statistical heft in order to confirm any finding, but I’m pretty sure it didn’t need to take so long or so many to drive this point home.

Women know it’s true because we’ve all experienced that combat-ready mindset that marks our mate-hunting years. We also know that I-can-live-on-coffee-and-air euphoria that comes with courtship. Nature wires us to snap out of such behavior the same way it programs bears to wake up in the Spring. Too much calorie-free bliss or too-long asleep in the hollow log will spell disaster.

The academics and other experts quoted by Nicholas Bakalar in the New York Times article are walking on eggshells as they offer theories for the weight gain of paired-off females. Because I’m not worried about tenure or angry readers, I can say what they’re afraid to:

We gain weight because we’re not on the market anymore.

There, I said it. When seeking a mate (or even a date for that upcoming family wedding) it makes sense that we work hard to achieve whatever constitutes attractiveness in our sphere. Usually, in this time and place in history, that means thinner vs. fatter. It can also mean adopting certain styles of dress or behaviors. (See index for “bra, push-up” and “friends, pretending to like”.)

Men, of course, have their own versions of adaptive mating-season behavior. I’m sure if any professional ballet company kept personal stats on attendees, the number of men in the audience who were on early dates would out-number the husbands by, oh, about twenty to one. (I’m stereotyping hetero guys here, but the principle expands to include any genre.)

I’m guessing that if this study monitored the diets of these same 6,000 women it would turn up some more revealing trends. We may have weighed less back in the day, but we did it fueled by Tab and Cheez-Its instead of the whole-grains and spinach we inhale now.

So, what’s better–a thin and unattached woman riddled with chemicals or a sturdier partnered female powered by fiber and sporting iron levels high enough to build a bridge? Evolution, gotta love it.

Jan 6, 2010

77 Words: “Food Matters” by Mark Bittman

0 Comments

For more 77 Words tiny book reviews, click here.

“Food Matters: A Guide to Conscious Eating” by Mark Bittman (Simon & Schuster, 2009) –

This NYTimes foodie’s niche is healthy eating without the heavy lifting, and his timing is impeccable. What better time to urge people away from McNuggets or faux organic junk-food and in the direction of quinoa wheat bread and blueberry smoothies? His arguments for being a Lessmeatatarian for the sake of one’s health and that of the Earth are compelling, not preachy. Recipes are terrific, especially the very, very easy breads. Food-safety worriers will like his approach too.

(For book reviews with more words, see my archive at The Seattle Times, where I worked for some years. I freelance for the paper as a reviewer and over the years have been assigned some terrific books.)

Jan 1, 2010

Onward science soldiers!

0 Comments

If you thought the so-called War on Drugs was pretty much lost, take heart. Here’s some news about a guy who might just get us pointed in the right direction.

One of the more arresting quotes has to do with alcohol abuse and defining a problem drinker:

“The measuring stick is known as ’3-14′ — so if someone is having 3 or more drinks a day, or 14 per week, that should raise a red flag, and physicians should be much better equipped to intervene and offer treatment options if there is a problem. Ideally, Dr. McLellan said, that treatment would be available in the medical system itself, not segregated in rehabilitation and detox programs, with their high failure rates.”

Dec 8, 2009

What we know still hurts us

0 Comments


The question of when a woman should begin annual mammograms is getting a lot of ink, air-time and, yes, close scrutiny in Congress, not a gang I reflexively list under the heading, “People I trust with my personal health-care decisions.”

(I’m trying not to veer into paranoia here, so I won’t dwell on my impression that such waffling never seems to happen around, say, male health problems.)

Most women I know, hear, or read about are quite peeved (or at least, unsettled) that there is such sharp disagreement in the medical-expert world over this. I share their peevedness, and at the same time, I keep thinking about how reluctant we often are to use good preventative-health info when we DO have it.

Consider:

Thanks to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, we know that that drinking gets rolling early in our lives, immediately boosting the odds for all manner of regrets, from car crashes to quickie marriages at the Vegas Elvis Chapel.

We know that booze is harder on women, and not simply because we tend to be smaller than men. To paraphrase the NIAAA folks, we’ve got less water inside us, so that Strawberry Mojito gets to the brain faster and makes us stupid sooner.

We adult women are more likely to get certain cancers and bone disease from too much alcohol. It takes surprisingly little alcohol to wreck our skin, addle our brains permanently, and cause us to mix up our meds. And although it is rarely written about, over-cocktailing by women is pretty much a direct ticket to picking dangerous/disappointing partners and ensuring a rotten sex life.

Okay, okay, so where does all this blogdignation get me? It isn’t that I don’t appreciate the progress made on many health fronts, including awareness of the risks of alcohol abuse. Nor do I think the folks who set health-screening standards should throw in the towel because we American women often thumb our nose at the solid wellness info we do have. I’m not even lobbying for Congress to get out of my doc’s exam room, exactly. (They’d just sneak back in anyway.)

I guess I’m just wishing that while the experts screw around with the mammogram-timing standards, we use some of the down time to pay attention to the solid life-saving facts that have already smacked us right in the kisser.

Dec 4, 2009

That noise? Oh, it’s my knee.

0 Comments

Even in this youth-obsessed culture of ours, there are a lot of things about aging that are kept very, very quiet.

You’d think any such bad tidings would be waved at us like so many flags, just as a way to further nationalize us into the high-fiber, deep-breathing, sun-avoidant, heart-rate-monitored, liposuctioned, mood-enhanced, hair-colored landscape of middle-aged America.

Yet somehow, we remain in the dark about the inevitable crossing over from Mono During Finals Week street, which heads straight through the Shouldn’t Move the Couch Alone zone, eventually pulling up to the Weird Maladies cul-de-sac. None of these territories are marked on a map. It’s easier to find out where Jennifer Aniston lives.

Suddenly we’re regulars in the Emergency Room, sheepishly huddled among the knife wounds and screaming ear-infected babies. We know what everyone else is thinking: She doesn’t look sick to me. Of course they don’t know, just as we didn’t until now, that Weird Maladies not only exist, they almost always happen on weekends or after hours.

Rashes, ringing in the ears, locked up backs, knees and jaws; apocalyptic reactions to foods once considered treats; numb hands, inexplicably swollen nose bridges. Who could have imagined?

One can only hope that during all the hard work over our new healthcare policy, someone slips in a small line-item for better age-related health education. No Child Left Behind was all well and good. Let’s get on to No Adult Sandbagged by the Inevitable.

Filed under Health, Human nature
Dec 1, 2009

Looking inside a sick system

0 Comments

Andrew Schneider, one of the best investigative reporters going, wrote this piece for Sphere, which is AOL’s new and promising news site. I don’t pretend to be objective — Schneider and I go way back — but I’m confident that I’m right about the quality of this piece.

It’s no news flash that people with health insurance get different care than those without it — but just how and when that happens is not always clear. Until we really grasp this process and where it collapses, we won’t be able to fix it.

This article sheds a lot of light on the issue. Another version runs on Cold Truth, Andy’s personal blog.

Nov 17, 2009

Happy hour in the woods, that’s the ticket

0 Comments

Why is it that every new revelation about boosting brainpower requires pursuing some pastime I’ve taken great pains to avoid?

The two examples that prompted this worry:

A brief piece in The New York Times claims “moderate drinking” after age 60 reduces the odds of developing dementia.

A fascinating essay that ran some months back in the Boston Globe, and was given to me by a friend yesterday. It says urban settings jumble the mind and reduce ability to concentrate, while greener, leafier surroundings have the opposite effect. (“How a city hurts your brain…and what you can do about it” by Jonah Lehrer.)

Now, with my gene pool, the likelihood of my practicing “moderate drinking” is roughly the same as indulging in “occasional invisibility.” So that leaves the rural-settings-are-better issue. That sound you hear is my heart sinking. My natural habitat is pavement, and I like my big blue skies best on a large multiplex screen.

Lehrer is utterly convincing when he explains just how a walk along a crowded city sidewalk causes our memories to short-circuit, nerves to fray and our self-control to erode. This is straightforward stuff, not windy theory.

The worst part is the connection between urban chaos and splurging. The same part of the brain monitors both things, and once you’ve busied the prefrontal cortex by dodging skateboarders and purse-snatchers, it’s hard to say no to a $3.65 cup of coffee. (At last, an answer to the question of why Starbucks locates stores so close together on city blocks.)

Embracing nature at this point in my life is unlikely. The sight of more than two trees together makes me nervous, as do chirping crickets, swooping birds, rustling grasses and large amounts of (unbottled) still water. (A fountain is fine. As long as I can hear sirens over the rushing water.)

I’m clinging to Lehrer’s point that “studies have found that even a relatively paltry patch of nature can confer benefits.” I hope this is true, because I’m thinking of borrowing some technology from the Seasonal Affective Disorder folks — you know, the ones who stare into those bright indoor lights to get over the winter blues?

Instead of lightbulbs, I’ll set up a small basket of potted plants and a strip of sod on the coffee table. I’ll ease into the habit of sitting quietly in front of it for a few minutes a day.

I’m wondering; would it be cheating to put part of a gum wrapper and some tiny pieces of broken glass in there? You know, just until I get used to spending time in the country.

Filed under Health, Science
Sep 2, 2009

Big hips sink ships

0 Comments

Finally, an intelligent movement toward containing the dangerous fat element in our society.

Surgeon Delos M. Cosgrove, CEO of the Cleveland Clinic, bravely stepped forward and said if he had his way, his health care facility, which already has a ban on hiring smokers, would quit hiring obese people.

(See the Aug. 16 New York Times Magazine piece by David Leonhardt that quotes him, here. The predictable bleating of knee-jerk apologists-for-the-zaftig followed.)

Cosgrove’s “tough love approach” as columnist Leonhardt cheerfully labels it, is a good start. But responsible hiring policies and a “fat tax,” as discussed in the commentary, are just the beginning. The nattering of weak-kneed fatanistas will soon fade, and real Americans can finally get down to the real work of protecting this country.

Given the way this whole torture business is being blown out of proportion, it’s no wonder that public figures are hanging back. But clear-headed people know that the fat-threat solution can be summed up in two words, and it’s time to step up and say them: Internment camps.

I know, I know, it sounds like a huge undertaking. You worry that it will distract us from the important business of getting the word out about President Obama’s missing birth certificate. But I respectfully suggest that the blueprint for the necessary relocation process already exists. No need to re-invent the wheel! A simple internet search will turn up all sorts of useful materials from the forward-thinking folks at the War Relocation Office of the 1940s. Simply substitute the word “obese” wherever “Japanese Americans” appears.

Filed under Health
Aug 24, 2009

Our stories, Ourselves

0 Comments

“When Cancer Changes Your Appearance,” by Brian Nelson in The New York Times, is an unusual essay, well worth your time.

I’ll wager that Mr. Nelson has dealt with more health problems than everyone on my block put together. He links to the Google document he’s created just to keep track of his doctors and maladies. He talks about the physical changes resulting from cancer treatments, which most recently have caused shocking facial swelling and affected speech. He writes:

“How does one deal with someone whose appearance has changed from the dashingly handsome (O.K., I’m taking some poetic license) to totally disfigured and, one might say, grotesque? We’ve been trained by movies and TV to worship perfection. After all, the bad guy is always either bald, short, limps, is missing an eye, scarred or has some other abnormality to distinguish him from us, the perfect audience. My close friend recently told me he was “shocked, I tell you, shocked,” by my appearance when he saw me again after six months. I’m shocked sometimes too.”

Why would someone choose to share such personal struggles in words and pictures? To help others, of course. And to distract oneself, to create a routine; to matter.

About 20 years ago I collaborated with Seattle veteran TV journalist Julie Blacklow to create a news feature that dealt with my getting treatment for a breast lump. Alarmingly titled “Kimberly’s Breast,” it ran during National Breast Cancer Awareness month. Ms. Blacklow did all the work; I showed up and flashed the relevant body part.

At the time I worked for Seattle’s best daily newspaper. (Now the city’s only one.) The week leading up to the airing of the special, promos seemed to blare out of the newsroom’s TVs every 15 minutes. Each time the announcer’s ominous tones entreated viewers to tune in to follow one woman’s challenge or some such phrase, everyone in the room looked stricken. I got tired of assuring them I was okay and finally hung up a note at my desk: “I’m Fine. Go Back To Being Sarcastic Wise-Asses.”

I’d asked Ms. Blacklow if she’d follow me through the medical process, starting with the first mammogram. (I’d found the lump myself and my primary-care doc sent me to a practice that specialized in such diagnostic radiology.) I reasoned that if it did turn out to be cancer, I’d need a project to keep from caving in to babbling panic. As I tend to do, I imagined the worst, and then came up with a plan to deal with it before it could actually happen. (I can’t prove it, but I’m pretty sure it was an ancestor of mine that coined that famous glass-half-empty toast, “May you be in Heaven one half-hour before the Devil knows you’re dead.”)

Through mammograms, ultrasound, removal of the lump, then more mammograms, the doctor, nurse and one very tall cameraman gamely crowded into a tiny exam room. (Like all good shooters, the camera guy could fold himself up like a map and fit into an impossibly small corner.)

In the end, the lump was not cancer, the story had a happy ending, and people no longer needed permission to be sarcastic wise-asses, so I took the note down.

Folks who’d had a breast-cancer scare in their world said thanks. Some of the people who hadn’t faced that particular fear seemed to understand the business of Oh-shit-I-found-a-lump a bit better. One of the curmudgeonly printers in the back shop took me aside and informed me he’d watched the show, then told his wife to get one of those mammogram things, pronto. She did.
I was glad I’d done the show.

Mr. Nelson, whose story is much more dramatic than mine, seems to live his life with a great mix of fortitude and humor. He climbed up on a very big stage to share his thoughts and experiences. I hope he’s up to his swollen neck in congratulatory email and text messages today, from people all over the world who feel less alone and scared because he went so very public about such very personal stuff.

Filed under Health
Aug 20, 2009

Let us bow our heads

0 Comments

It’s true: Hospitals and casinos are remarkably similar.

Years of family visits to Reno and Lake Tahoe have acquainted me with every casino restaurant for miles. That’s where you go to eat with a large group. Ditto for hotel accommodations. Even if you don’t gamble, there’s no avoiding gaming culture.

Last week I hung out in the astonishingly well-run St. Vincent’s Providence Hospital in Portland, Oregon, while my best friend recovered from scary emergency surgery. It took me a day or so to pinpoint the source of that eerie deja vu. Then it came to me: Only the slot machines were missing.

We go to casinos and hospitals seeking a change in our luck, sometimes betting against hugely unfavorable odds. The first day or so is a blur of hope and gratitude, which give way to weariness, regardless of how things are going.

The best-run of both rely on long-time staff people with inexplicable loyalty and high degree of personal pride. A discarded gum wrapper is a moral affront to the worker in both settings. While all are welcome at St. Vincent’s, it is most definitely a Catholic facility, evidenced by crucifixes in the rooms and historical murals showing the tireless Sisters of Providence who brought lifesaving care to the forested wilderness. Another sort of dogged pioneer brought life to the dessert of Nevada, an equally unlikely, and some would say, lifesaving, venture.

Both places have unique etiquette:

Use hand sanitizer at every door/Place chips on the table, not in the dealer’s hand.

Both also move us to suspend normal behaviors. We tell strangers in the elevator about losing the farm and the appendix. We call for a hooker or a chaplain to get us through the dark night. When the bill comes due, we’re shocked. Then we rally and talk about how “it could have been worse if…”

In both we hope for things that are out of reach; we mutter to God under our breath, promising to be better people if we’re dealt a good hand just this once.

Filed under Faith, Health, Human nature
Jul 28, 2009

A wild idea: Tackle health care while we’re waiting to solve it

1 Comment


If we can just step away from the Is it Socialism? argument for five minutes and consider some interim measures, we might have a prayer of slowing down the health-care avalanche.

Some things to consider while we watch Congress roll in the mud:

Accept the reality that many Americans will always get care from ER and doc-in-a-box settings, and invest in that model. Create a wellness counterpart, where drop-in consultation is available for preventative, nutrition, counseling services.

If obesity is so expensive, why don’t we offer universal, free Weight Watchers-model health care? And if Wal-Mart can sell $89 drugs for $4 a pop…well, you know the rest of that sentence.

Establish universal standards of care and fee ranges that consumers, not just providers, know going in. If we already know that if it takes a $50,000 machine and a $30/hour tech to run it for 2 hours per patient then we can pencil out the cost for a place that sees 100 patients and the place that sees 1,000. (Oops! Took longer for that guy…good thing there’s a price range.)

–In that previous vein (pun intended), establish a consumer-protection model as the industry norm. Hey, funeral directors had to do it and it works just fine. And people said it would be impossible to regulate prices of services/goods that are purchased during a time of great stress and grief.

Tax people at a higher rate when they have financial interest in any facility or related insurance or medical company to which they can refer patients;

Provide real educational-cost incentives for future docs, nurses and medical personnel. This doesn’t mean deferred loans. It means real cuts and practical support for older people who have aptitude to switch careers;

Speed up the inevitable move of coverage away from employer-based system, although encourage employers to offer coverage as a perk to attract workers;

Encourage private health co-ops (through tax breaks and other supports) which are organized by neighborhood, profession, alumni groups, ethnic/fraternal groups. A sort of upscale revisiting of the settlement houses that served immigrants in the 19th and early 20th centuries;

Stop pretending that “basic health care” means TB screens and annual physicals. It means wellness education; mental health and addictions treatment; full blood-panel testing that screens beyond the basics; birth-control services; vision/hearing services; and pain management clinics;

Encourage cooperation between medical-government-law enforcement communities in order to begin to get a real handle on use/sale/manufacture of drugs that create huge problems (and costs) for family stability, public safety, business and health;

Allow medical-care “credits” to be accrued and shared. If I don’t spend mine this year, you can have ‘em. This move alone will shut up a lot of the arguing over Right to Die laws. If I want to opt out of treatment that prolongs my life, I can leave health care credits to my family. So there! And finally…

Require that all members of Congress sit in an ER on a busy weekend night for 8 hours once a month.

Filed under Government, Health, Politics
Jun 16, 2009

Who’s in charge around here?

I’m a former daily newspaper journalist who worked in the Pacific Northwest and New England. Now a book reviewer, writer, editor, iMac user.

Read more in the About section.

Email me at kimberly@typelikethewind.com

Share Follow typelikethewind on Twitter